After each session of Vatican II, Ratzinger wrote a booklet about the debates and developments at the Council. These booklets were collected and published simultaneously in German, Italian, and English in 1966. The edition I work from on this blog is Theological Highlights of Vatican II (Paulist Press: New York, 1966).
About the Site:
- Twelve Months, Sixteen Books.
Links
Pages
- About
- Ratzinger’s Writings
- (1961) Primacy, Episcopacy, and Successio Apostolica
- (1963-1966) Theological Highlights of Vatican II
- (1965) The Question of the Concept of Tradition: A Provisional Response
- (1968) Introduction to Christianity
- (1972) Conscience in Its Time
- (1977) Daughter Zion
- (1977) Eschatology: Death and Eternal Life
- (1978) Eschatology and Utopia
- The Primacy of the Pope and the Unity of the People of God
- Principles of Catholic Theology
- Handing on the Faith in an Age of Disbelief
- The Ratzinger Report
- (1992) The Nature and Mission of Theology
- (1996) Salt of the Earth
- The Spirit of the Liturgy
Categories:
- Blogonomics (1)
- God (1)
- liturgy (1)
- Mary (1)
- tradition (1)
- Uncategorized (84)
- Vatican II (3)
Monthly:
- September 2011 (4)
- January 2011 (2)
- December 2010 (1)
- October 2010 (2)
- August 2010 (6)
- July 2010 (14)
- June 2010 (7)
- May 2010 (9)
- April 2010 (1)
- March 2010 (12)
- February 2010 (19)
- January 2010 (13)
Blog at WordPress.com. — Theme: Connections by www.vanillamist.com.
January 12, 2010 at 3:10 pm
[...] Ratzinger wrote a popular report on what had happened, later published as the first section of Theological Highlights of Vatican II. In that article, he stressed that the most important event of the first session is that the [...]
January 2, 2011 at 10:23 am
[...] (1963-1966) Theological Highlights of Vatican II January 2010 1 comment 4 [...]
April 17, 2011 at 4:36 am
I recently read “Theological Highlights” and was surprised at (and refreshed by)many of his comments about the ecclesial environment prior to the Council. For example:
“We shall have occasion later to show in more detail how the anti-Modernistic neurosis which had again and again crippled the Church since the turn of the century here seemed to be approaching a cure. Here there emerged a new awareness of how the Church could conduct a dialogue in fraternal frankness without violating the obedience that belongs to faith.” page 27
Do you know whether he ever changed his view about this?